Principal Agent Model
Just like a lot of other classmates’ blog
posts, I do not think I had a situation like this in my life where I had to be
in the triangle situation with two principals. However, I have a friend who is four
years older than me and she told me about what makes her feel drastic about her
work that I believe fits well into a triangle principals-agent model.
My friend works as the journalist of a
top news channel in Taiwan. After graduating from college, she accepted the
offer as it was what she was passionate in and was a decent paying job. She
wanted to deliver the news on camera of the matters that needed people’s
attention to, so that through her, those in need can be helped. Every morning, her
team had an internal meeting on the topics that each journalist will do
research on and also on the topics that will be broadcasted that evening. Then
the manager of the team would have a meeting with the department head with all
other managers in the company.
I learned from her that news not only
relies on the funding from the country, but also from advertisements that
appear before and after the news broadcast. In other words, the boss of the broadcast
company would want as many people to watch his or her channel’s news so that
the price to advertise can rise and raise the revenue of the company. This
meant that the boss wanted a more pungent topic
that could lure general public’s attention, such as the face of a criminal or
the footage of the agonized victim.
The department head and managers were
also journalists who covered stories
with passion like my friend. Hence, they understand how badly the new hires
want to pose impact on the society and not just the headlines that can lure more
views. But as it was a command of the boss, the department head ordered certain
managers to dig into topics that were trendy enough and others on the social topics
that the news needs to deliver, and rotate the teams so that all the
journalists can fulfill their career goal, but in the meantime, meet the boss’s
demand.
In a situation
like so, the journalists and team managers may not seem like a principal for
the agent, department head. But considering the fact that the department head
connects with the managers and other journalists and understand the frustration
that they may encounter, I believe the agent is trying to negotiate and propose
a solution to the problem that the news channel faced.
In a work
setting, I believe it is critical to talk about how each person want to
contribute for the company and make the communication flow so that every can
pose efficiency to the firm. If the department head commanded all the journalists
to publish current news that are just merely popular, I believe more viewers may
watch the channel, but have a very bad impression that the news cover violent
or seemingly important topics when there are social topics that need more
attention but that does not sound as interesting. Also, another consequence
could have been that the journalists may leave their current job and look for
other companies that they can express their enthusiasm. Hence, I believe my friend
was satisfied with the agent’s way of resolving the tension and that is why she
is still working at the same place for over 8 years now.
In the U.S. there is publicly funded News and other programming. In Champaign-Urbana, you can access that WILL radio or TV. It is largely supported by contributors. I wonder if such an alternative exists in Taiwan.
ReplyDeleteHowever, let's consider commercial news in the U.S.. The world is quite different this way now, as compared to when I was growing up. Then (before cable TV and before the Internet) there were three major networks- CBS, NBC, and ABC and each night they did a half hour of national news and a half hour of local news. The delivered opinion/commentary shows on Sunday morning. Other than that, the programming was non-news. So there was far less competition for viewers' attention and the quality in terms of having newsworthy content was reasonably good, even with the commercials paying for the programming.
Now we have several stations on Cable that are all news 7x24, and we have other programming news programming available online. The competition for viewer interest is fierce and that does distort the programming, as you might guess. My view of what is happening is that the networks try to turn the viewers into addicts, who will keep on watching. It's unfortunate, but I believe a consequence of this sort of competition. I think it also has a strong impact on our politics and on the people who write for newspapers. Both end up on the TV programming so it all becomes part of a media circus.
I wonder what the competition level is in Taiwan. You can be very principled about doing the news the right way, but if you don't have enough of an audience, your news show will go bankrupt. So you should consider the analysis you've done in light of how much competition for news programming there is in Taiwan.
From my understanding, there are quite a lot of channels that broadcast news only. However, from what my friend told me, the time people spend watching the news is far less now than 10 years ago, because people now rely more on watching the internet news rather than turning on Television to do so. Also, nowadays, news broadcasts are reproduced into shorter Youtube videos. I believe the CEO of the channel wanted news topics that will allow the video to go viral.
Delete